In Tim’s open letter, he says that “The Conservative Government last
night brought forward plans for £12bn of cuts to welfare that will directly
impact millions of people across the country including the poorest families in
our constituencies.
The Conservatives do not need to make
these cuts, especially at the same time as giving tax breaks to millionaires.”. I completely
agree with this sentiment, however I also believe the cut to the Bankers Bonus
and the reduction in the top rate of tax whilst introducing the bedroom tax,
increasing VAT and abolishing the education maintenance allowance, all brought
about whilst the Lib Dems were in coalition, were equally abhorrent plans.
Tim
Farron goes on to say that “The
people who will be hit by these changes need someone to give them a voice in
Parliament and fight their corner, and last night Labour failed to stand up for
them.“. This is pretty
hard to argue with. Whilst Labour fought against the coalition cuts that
impacted the poorest members of society alone for five years and have provided
this voice consistently for at least the course of my lifetime, I agree that
they have got this one wrong. Coming from the Lib Dems who consistently failed
to fight their corner in government is a tad rich though. There is a fantastic speech
from Glenda Jackson on the subject of benefits wrongly being taken away from
people.
Something that happened whilst the Lib Dems were in coalition and something they
failed to address.
We are consistent
in our opposition. In Government we blocked these measures and in opposition we
are voting against them.“. So I think Tim is trying to claim that they are fighting
for social justice which Labour have failed to do and that they did this in government.
I can only assume that his support for the reduction in funding for charities
and Sure Start Centre’s, many of which closed whilst the Lib Dems were in
coalition, are cuts he does not deem “cruel and excessive”. Also, I can only
conclude that making disabled people and parents who share custody of a child
financially worse off is something Tim Farron believes is helping social justice.
To finish
Tim says “To give in to the narrative that
the answer to our country’s needs is to pit the poorest in the country
against one another is shameful.”
I agree that attacking the poorest members of society is shameful. That the Lib
Dems only rarely criticised their coalition partners for this over the last
five years is a fact that renders their criticism of Labour somewhat redundant.
To be
lectured on supporting poor people by a party that had a hand in a staggering
rise in food-banks in this country is something beyond distasteful. When the Lib
Dems were ignoring all of the opportunities to amend or throw out the Bedroom
tax whilst in government, Labour were fighting to make these people’s voices
heard. People who were having their benefits cut for having a “spare room” to
store equipment for their disability, or the child they shared custody of or
even the husband who had become a carer for his wife and needed to sleep in a separate
room.
Politically,
I understand the Lib Dems need to distance themselves from the Tories (that
they were punished so badly by the electorate for supporting in government).
Also, I understand their desire to distinguish themselves from the Labour party
as a different party. However, after being in government and propping up the
Tories, their attempt to position themselves as somehow supportive of people
who rely on welfare, without apology for their actions in government, is
immensely hypocritical. It would be laughable; were not the results of their
time in coalition so devastating for many of these people they are now claiming
to represent.
No comments:
Post a Comment